Ghost Palette

Published ImageBench methodology and leaderboard reference.

ImageBench V1

Published benchmark reference

Ghost Palette reproduces the fixed ImageBench V1 suite for live scoring. This page mirrors the public methodology and leaderboard from imagebench.ai — 22 models, 192 prompts, six capability categories, every output published.

Benchmark structure

64 tests × 3 prompt variants = 192 images per model. Categories match the upstream CSV exactly.

  • Text Rendering5 tests — Spelling, multi-line layout, typography style
  • Spatial Reasoning19 tests — Counting, relative position, scale, compositionality
  • Human realism14 tests — Faces, expressions, hands, full-body coherence
  • Professional Studio9 tests — Camera and lighting control, color precision
  • Graphical design8 tests — Layout, style diversity, data visualization
  • Truthfulness9 tests — Physics, reflections, world knowledge constraints

Design goals

  • Broad capability coverage across six categories and multiple difficulty tiers.
  • Three prompt variants per test to reduce lucky or unlucky single-sample variance.
  • VLM-graded PASS/FAIL decisions using concrete, test-specific evaluation criteria.
  • Reproducibility through fixed prompt definitions and deterministic routing policy.

Evaluation pipeline

  1. Generate 192 images for the target model from the fixed V1 prompt suite.
  2. Ask vision judges a concrete binary question per image and parse a PASS/FAIL verdict.
  3. Apply category-level preferred/fallback routing to produce one blended verdict per image.
  4. Aggregate overall, category, subcategory, and difficulty pass rates for publication.

Multi-VLM routing

ImageBench assigns a preferred vision judge per category. Ghost Palette maps these routes to Gemini 2.5 Flash via fal OpenRouter for grading.

CategoryPreferred VLM
Text Renderingqwen3-vl
Spatial Reasoningqwen35-122b
Human realismqwen3-vl
Professional Studiogemma4-26b
Graphical designqwen3-vl
Truthfulnessqwen36-27b

Scoring

Capability pass rate: score = PASS count / total evaluated images, reported per category, subcategory, and difficulty tier. The headline Overall score blends it 50/50 with an aesthetic Estimated Preference axis: Overall = 0.5 × Capability + 0.5 × Estimated Preference. See the methodology write-up for the full definition.

Published V1 leaderboard

Copied from imagebench.ai/imagebench-v1. Re-sync with node scripts/sync-imagebench-leaderboard.mjs.

22Models evaluated
192Fixed prompts
95.3%Top — fal/google/nano-banana-2

Published pass rates from ImageBench.ai as of 2026-06-22. Every output is inspectable on their site — click a model to browse all 192 images.

Reproduce on Ghost Palette

Run the same 192-prompt suite through our generation adapters and VLM judge to compare against these published scores.